What OTAs really cost

The Expedia Rate Parity Lawsuit: What It Means for Independent Hotels

Short answer

On October 2, 2026, three travelers filed a proposed class action against Expedia Group in federal court in Seattle. They claim Expedia's rate parity clause and search ranking stop hotels from offering lower prices on their own websites and on other booking sites. Nothing changes for your hotel yet: the case is at its first stage.

Many owners would like to charge less on their own website than on Expedia, because a direct booking costs them less. A new lawsuit says Expedia's terms are the reason they cannot. Hotels are not parties to the case, but its outcome could change the rules you sign. We read the court docket and the full complaint on October 19, 2026. Everything below about the case is what the plaintiffs claim, not what a court has found.

What does the Expedia lawsuit claim?

The case is Andrews v. Expedia Group, Inc., No. 2:26-cv-03743, in the US District Court for the Western District of Washington (court docket). The plaintiffs are three travelers: one booked directly with Hilton, and two booked through Priceline. They sue under the Sherman Act and ask for triple damages and an order stopping the conduct. The complaint says:

  • Expedia handles nearly 80% of the value of US hotel bookings made through booking sites.
  • Expedia charges hotels a commission of about 15%, and as much as 25% to 30% for hotels that buy extra visibility.
  • Its standard contract stops hotels from offering a lower rate on their own websites.
  • Four parts of its search ranking punish hotels that are cheaper on other booking sites: a rate competitiveness factor, a "most likely to convert" factor, an automatic rate match tool and the VIP Access program.
  • As a result, guests pay too much whether they book through Expedia, directly with the hotel or through another booking site.

The plaintiffs want to represent two groups: people who booked directly with a US hotel listed on Expedia, and people who booked such a hotel through another booking site, from October 2, 2022 onward. No class has been certified. When we read the docket, it showed the complaint, the summons and lawyers being admitted, and no response from Expedia yet.

What does Expedia's contract actually say?

The complaint quotes section C.1 of Expedia's standard Lodging Agreement, a template on its partner site. It says that, unless you are located in Australia, the rates you give Expedia "will be equal to or better than" those on your own Online Public booking channels.

The agreement defines Online Public as marketed or published to the general public online. It leaves out two things that matter to a small hotel:

  • Private online messages. Email, text messages and instant messages that are not aimed at the general public.
  • Offline bookings. Bookings made in person at reception, by phone or at a travel agency, as long as those rates are not published or marketed online.
Nothing has changed yet

The clause stays in your agreement while the case runs. Under the template wording, a lower public price on your own website than on Expedia breaks it. Your signed agreement may differ from the template, so read section C.1 and the cancellation section D.2 in your own copy.

How does Expedia's search ranking come into it?

Expedia's contract compares it with your own channels, not with other booking sites. The complaint says the ranking does the rest. Expedia's own guide to its search ranking says its algorithm puts "the strongest offers" at the top of search results and lists "rate competitiveness" second among the factors in a property's offer strength score, after room availability. The same page says Expedia also considers how much it is paid on a stay.

So a hotel that is cheaper on Booking.com than on Expedia may slip down Expedia's results. The complaint argues this makes it pointless for any booking site to cut its commission, because hotels could not pass the saving on as a lower price. That is the claim the court will test.

Has this happened anywhere else?

Yes, outside the US. The EU's top court ruled on September 19, 2024 that parity clauses on hotel booking platforms, wide or narrow, had not been shown to be necessary for the platform to work (Court of Justice of the EU press release). Expedia's own template carves out Australia. For the countries where Booking.com and Expedia dropped parity, see rate parity for US hotels.

The US has no such ruling or law. Booking.com's standard terms still treat the US as a wide parity country, which covers other booking sites too. This lawsuit is against Expedia only.

Where you offer a lower rateExpedia templateBooking.com standard US terms
Your public websiteNot allowedNot allowed
Email to your own listNot covered, if not aimed at the general publicOnly as a closed user group rate
Phone and front deskNot covered, if not published or marketed onlineCovered
Other booking sitesNot in the contract (the lawsuit is about ranking)Covered

Source: Expedia Lodging Agreement template and Booking.com General Delivery Terms. Your signed agreements decide. Not legal advice.

What should an independent hotel do now?

  1. Read both contracts. A rate that Expedia's template allows can still breach Booking.com's wider terms, and the stricter one wins in practice.
  2. Do not change public prices because of the lawsuit. A complaint is not a ruling.
  3. Win on cost, not price. At the same price, a booking on your own website still costs you far less than one carrying a 15% to 30% commission. See direct booking vs OTA: what each booking really costs for the sums.
  4. Use the channels you control. Email to past guests who agreed to hear from you is the clearest case; see email to past guests.
  5. Watch the docket. It is public, and we will update this page when the court rules on anything that matters to hotels.

To see what each booking that moves to your own website is worth at the same price, try our savings calculator.

MarginStay helps independent hotels bring in direct bookings, so we have a stake in this topic. We are not lawyers, and this is not legal advice. The case facts come from the court docket and the complaint, and the contract wording from Expedia's Lodging Agreement template, all read on October 19, 2026. The figures about Expedia's market share and commissions are the plaintiffs' claims.

Expedia lawsuit: quick answers

Is Expedia being sued over rate parity?

Yes. On October 2, 2026, three travelers filed a proposed class action, Andrews v. Expedia Group, in federal court in Seattle. They claim Expedia's parity clause and search ranking keep hotel prices high on every channel, and they sue under the Sherman Act. No class has been certified and no court has ruled on the claims.

Can I charge less on my own website than on Expedia?

Not publicly, under Expedia's standard Lodging Agreement. Section C.1 asks for rates equal to or better than those on your own online public channels, except in Australia. The agreement leaves out private email and text offers and offline rates that are not published online. Booking.com's US terms are wider, so check both contracts.

Will the lawsuit lower Expedia's commission?

No one can say yet. The case is at its first stage, and Expedia had not responded in court when we read the docket on October 19, 2026. Until a court rules or the parties settle, your agreement and commission stay as they are. Compare channels on what each booking costs you today.

Does the lawsuit include Booking.com?

No. The only defendant is Expedia Group. The complaint says Booking.com removed similar clauses for hotels in the European Economic Area, but Booking.com's standard terms still treat the United States as a wide parity country, which also covers other booking sites, phone and front desk rates.

Win the booking at the same price

Parity limits what you charge, not where guests book. Talk to us about bringing guests to your own website, or see first what booking sites cost you today.

See your numbers

Sources